ListedTech
  • Data Portals
    • Portal for Industry
    • Portal for Institutions
    • Webinars
  • Product Categories & Reports
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Documentation
    • Webinars
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Data Overview
    • Traditional IT Research vs. ListEdTech
    • In the Media
    • Contact Us

Search the website...

Go to Portal
Posted on September 14, 2022 | by Justin Ménard

Are Institutions Buying More From the Same Product Suite?

Customer Relationship Management Grant Management Systems Institution Data
Graph presenting the stand-alone implementation and product suite implementations for the CRM category

This post originates from a discussion with a client. He was wondering if an institution tends to select additional products from the same product suite if it were to expand its IT offering. From the data collected at ListEdTech, the answer is that it depends on the product category.

For some product groups, we note that if an institution has already implemented one product from a product suite, it would be more inclined to select other products from this suite.

Why?

  • The product will integrate seamlessly with the other products in place.
  • Usually, this business practice requires fewer resources.
  • The institution only deals with one company for several transactions (possibility of a discount on multiple contracts?).

If an institution selects the best-of-breed product, this could lead to more complex integration. However, the institution would install a product that answers nearly all its needs and concerns.

Two Product Categories: Two Stories

To explore the best-of-suite approach, we have selected two product categories: Grants and CRM. For the grant group, we have chosen companies with extensive product offerings: Cayuse, Huron and InfoEd.

The graph presents grant system implementations, sorting them as product suite or stand alone. The trend: more product suite implementations over the past two decades.

With companies developing their product offering over time, institutions implement more products as part of a product suite every year. Recently, multiple acquisitions we saw in the grant product category also reinforce this best-of-suite approach.

The trend in the Grants product category is not one we see across all product groups. We notice the opposite situation in the CRM broader product category (Admissions, Alumni and General). The “stand-alone” implementation is more common nowadays than in the product suite.

The graph presents CRM implementations, sorting them as product suite or stand alone. The trend: more stand alone implementations over the past two decades.

In the CRM product group, it is not rare to see multiple product implementations for one institution. ERP solutions usually include a CRM/Communication tool that is often not tailored to the institution’s situation. Therefore, the university/college chooses to implement another CRM software. It is usually a niche product to address specific tasks: admission process, donor relations, or specific faculty/office requirements. This second or third CRM implementation might be out of the product suite.

Note: For the CRM product group, product suites include all ERP and large CRM companies with multiple (5+) products.

Institution employees and higher management: does your institution have more of a best-of-suite or a best-of-breed approach? We would love to hear your stories. Share them on our social media: LinkedIn, and Twitter.

Post navigation

Workday: Focus on Student Success
Is ZeeMee the Next Facebook?
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
  • CAPTCHA image

    * All fields are required.

  • Listen to Our Podcast


  • Recent Posts

    • Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders? October 15, 2025
    • Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus October 1, 2025
    • Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech September 24, 2025
    • Thesis: From Unit4 Spin‑Off to SIS Specialist September 17, 2025
    • How Institutions Discover What Tech Their Peers Are Using September 3, 2025

Stay in the know…

Blog & News
Higher Ed Market Data

Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?

This year, I’ve been revisiting some of the classic business books: Blue Ocean Shift, Free, The Innovator’s Dilemma, Zero to One, and of course, Crossing the Chasm. That last one really got me thinking about early adopters. In tech markets, they’re the people (or in HigherEd, the institutions) who are comfortable taking risks, trying something new, and shaping the market ... Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?  Read More
Market Data Market Movements

Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus

September 2025 marked a major turning point for Anthology, the owner of Blackboard and several other higher education technology platforms. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. after efforts to sell itself or parts of its business outside of court failed. The filing is not a liquidation. Instead, it is a structured reorganization designed to ... Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus  Read More
ListEdTech Market Data

Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech

Market saturation is a concept we often discuss at ListEdTech because it comes up frequently with our clients. Investors want to know if a market still has room to grow, while startups want to understand whether they are entering a space with opportunities or one that is already crowded. Last year, we explored saturation by ... Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech  Read More
Footer Logo - LisTedTECH
  • Contact Us
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use